To the person who PM'd me; thanks but I seemingly can't reply privately via PM for some reason. As an active supporter of Image for twenty years I appreciate your points. I'd like to point out that I wasn't the one who started acting the bollix in thread but responded in kind after I was targetted, I won't respond to baiting in future.
In response to your PM firstly I feel that as an active Image supporter since it's it's debut I have the right to voice my opinion when I feel Image is doing something negative as I did repeatedly when I felt Image was doing something positive on this board's predecessors and across comic boards for many years.
I disagree with you in that I believe this can only hurt Image. Do many creators believe this book will actually ship? Image already has an unbelievable roster of 'new' A-List creators for 2012 with Brubaker, Phillips, Vaughn, Ross (this guy is so HUGE in the UK and Ireland it's unreal), Hitch et al that it doesn't need a guy who's never finished a series for Image (who hasn't built up the credits that someone like say Liefeld has) to say 'look at us'.
As a fan Image has sent out a signal that a creator doesn't have to honour his commitments to fans and retailers before Image will indulge his next venture. Someone similar like say again Liefeld (as an example) has a free pass as far as I'm concerned given his part taking a huge personal risk and setting up Image. Millar however has done nothing to build up credit with Image to counteract his prior screwing of it other than being a 'big name'. Which is unfair to all the other 'big name' creators who are working their asses off for Image and all the smaller ones doing the same.
Looking at the latest Milarworld books Millar has 'given' Image the book least likely to appear clearly giving the impression 'ICON' is the place to be. New Image friendly titles Supercrooks, Secret Service all seem to have work in the bag with reliable creators ditto Hitgirl. Nemesis 2 I'm not so sure about.
Millar can manage 1.5 books a month according to himself, excluding Jupiter's Children he's got at least 20 to produce this year (Millar NEVER stockpiles scripts) and that's without factoring in the details of a newborn kid to look after, his NEW production company and his tendencey to drop everything if he gets a whiff of Hollywood.
Nearly 2 years ago he announced he was directing 'Miracle Park', he got himself tons of domestic publicity used it's premiere to sell tickets to his new convention sought cvs from local talent and dozens of people personally contributed time and effort to the project in the expectation that the end result could be added to their CVs. Millar abandoned the project after 3 weeks of shooting never to return leaving dozens of people with nothing to show for their efforts. His reason? The slim possibility of a Supercrooks Hollywood flick concieved after work began on Miracle Park.
That's how Millar operates.
I believe promoting and supporting Millar without publishing the last 3 issues of War Heroes will benefit Image in the long term as much as Image United did. It just shows that if you're a big enough name you can screw Image to your hearts content and they'll still love you.
Adam O. Pruett wrote:
And Mikey, my refusal to address your points stems from the fact that you seem to be incapable of following one of the board's only rules. If and when you are capable of having a civilized discussion, we can have one.
Says the guy who addressed me first under 2 different names, invented a background for me, introduced bodily orificess into the thread and dismisses facts and spreads BS (which "various Image Anthologies" has Millar contributed too again?) consistently to attack my points.
Adam O. Pruett wrote:
Lastly -- you keep bringing up specific details of Millar's deals that you couldn't possibly know unless you were present at the time.
Or read Public interviews and posts where Millar discussed them.
Adam O. Pruett wrote:
You may have heard Millar or Harris or a publisher speak publicly about one of these deals -- but once again, that's anecdotal, and can't be offered as evidence in an argument. Even if the numbers cited are correct, you're still talking about a situation where only those involved with the deal have all the information. I can't bring myself to make make emotionally charged sweeping generalizations based on partial/anecdotal information. I can't get that worked up over something when I don't know the whole story and all of the factors/details involved.
You need to learn what 'anecdotal' means. All my info comes direct from the horses mouth first hand from publicly available interviews, posts and tweets that are still accessible if you bothered investigating what you were poting rather than making it up.
Adam O. Pruett wrote:
I may have been mistaken about this, but I'd prefer not just going on your intuition alone. When I've heard Mark say his name, it's sounded like "Miller" to me. Perhaps I'm misremembering. A Google search reveals lots of pages saying "pronounced Miller" but I suppose they could be wrong.
Larsen agrees with you, all I know is that when I met first hand (not anecdotedly) Millar over a drink with Grant Morrisson back in '93 (where I pimped Dragon as the best of the Image comics natch) he introduced himself as Mark Millarrr. It could be he's changed that personal detail about himself as he has others over the years.
Mikey